Winter Without Your Gasoline Car?

By Steve Goreham

Originally published in MasterResource.

January of this year brought near-zero temperatures to Chicago and other northern cites, producing an electric vehicle (EV) charging nightmare. National media showed images of owners pushing dead EVs around charging stations and waiting for hours to try to charge their vehicle. Drivers lucky enough to connect to a charger sat in their freezing-cold automobile, unable to run the heater while the car tried to charge. Nevertheless, the federal government and many states continue to push to eliminate gasoline vehicles.

Continue reading “Winter Without Your Gasoline Car?”

Bogus Global Warming Claims by Pacific Islands. Australian PM Takes the Bait, Sinker and all.

By Cliff Reece

Global warming activists routinely argue that numerous Pacific Islands will soon be under water due to rising sea levels caused by climate change.

But recent population patterns suggest Pacific Islanders know they are not facing substantial threats from sea-level rise. Some allegedly “endangered” islands have even built or made plans to build new airports or resorts.

Continue reading “Bogus Global Warming Claims by Pacific Islands. Australian PM Takes the Bait, Sinker and all.”

Why I will vote “NO” – by G.M Derrick

By Dr G. M. Derrick

“It sounds like a Voice to me”

Basic Principles – The Voice as proposed is racist.


James Allen – Spectator 2 May 23
“the Voice will undermine the core concept of equal citizenship that lies at the heart of any liberal democracy. Some will get rights others do not, and on a group-rights basis.”

Continue reading the document [PDF, 813 kB]: https://saltbushclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/the-voice-comments-derrick.pdf

Why I will vote “No”

By Viv Forbes and many friends

Australians are being asked to approve a permanent change to our constitution. Their proposal is racist in intent and divisive in effect.

No humans evolved here in Australia – our ancestors all came from somewhere else. The literal meaning of “indigenous” is “born here”, so most of us are indigenous. To try to divide indigenous Australians on the basis of skin colour or length of ancestry is more about politics than justice or good government. We are all Australians and we should never contemplate constitutional changes that promote and solidify racial division.

I am voting “No” because this proposal is going in the wrong direction and is serving other agendas. There are many reasons to vote NO:

Continue reading “Why I will vote “No””

MARCIA LANGTON’S ‘HATE’ SPEECH SAYS IT ALL!

By Cliff Reece

Marcia Langton, the prominent ‘Yes’ campaigner, and key Voice architect accused ‘No’ voters of being either racists or plain stupid while speaking to a forum in Bunbury, Western Australia. And it was said with pure hatred on her face and in her voice.

She later claimed that she wasn’t referring to ‘No’ voters but only those promoting the ‘No’ case – presumably people like Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine. I don’t think either of them are racist or stupid – do you?

Her outrageous comments were then deleted from social media platforms just minutes after they were reported on Sharri Markson’s Sky News program.

Continue reading “MARCIA LANGTON’S ‘HATE’ SPEECH SAYS IT ALL!”

Our Sacred Land?

By Viv Forbes

My wife and I were both born in Australia, as were two children and four grandchildren. Our parents were born in Australia as were all of their parents. And some ancestors go back much further in this land.

I feel rage every time I have to sit through another patronising “welcome to country” charade, designed to make me feel an intruder in my own land. Indigenous history on this continent is the same as our family story – it just goes back a bit further.

The first aboriginals probably walked here over a land bridge and Europeans came later in sailing clippers. All caused displacement of prior inhabitants. They brought dingos which are now “protected” – we brought cattle, sheep, horses and ploughs which are increasingly condemned. They mined ochre, quartzite and basalt, which are now heritage sites – but our coal mines are widely condemned. They brought spears and boomerangs – we brought guns and swords.

Racial referenda, indigenous “Welcomes”, talk of Treaties and special land rights for some Australians just create and maintain division. How long before we are one people with the same rights and responsibilities?

Two centuries is surely time enough?

IS THE ULURU STATEMENT FROM THE HEART ONE OR 26 PAGES?

By Cliff Reece

The above is what Prime Minister Albanese and Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney and their colleagues in government and all the ‘Yes’ vote activists are telling us is the full extent of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. They are trying to deceive voters into thinking that this is the full statement that the Prime Minister has referred to on numerous occasions and promised to implement “in full”.

However, the real Uluru Statement from the Heart most definitely comprises 26 pages. It is titled ‘Document 14’ and starts on page 87 of a much larger series of documents and continues without a break and in exactly the same format and print font until page 112 – that’s 26 pages! The major heading on page 87 states: ‘ULURU STATEMENT FROM THE HEART. All the following 25 pages have sub-headings only. It is clearly one document.

Following these 26 pages there are additional notes, record of meetings etc. that are obviously attachments. These are the pages Albanese referred to in his radio interview with Neil Mitchell at 3AW. He also stated during that interview that he had not read any of these pages – only the poster! As amazing as that is, he also went on to ask “Why would I?” suggesting there is nothing of importance to read.

Continue reading “IS THE ULURU STATEMENT FROM THE HEART ONE OR 26 PAGES?”

Net Zero Nonsense

By Bryan Leyland

Net Zero electricity by 2030 using wind and solar power is an impossible dream: the technologies and resources needed to carry it out don’t exist. (“Net Zero” means that we do not burn gas and coal for electricity generation except, maybe, in dry years.)

The report by the Interim Committee on Climate Change stated correctly that we would need fossil fuels for the foreseeable future to keep the lights on during windless nights and during dry hydro years. This report was shelved by the government and superseded by a Climate Commission report that had minimal (if any) input from experienced power system engineers.

Continue reading “Net Zero Nonsense”